020 7224 4622info@thenaturaldoctor.org
The Natural Doctor
The Natural Doctor
logo
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • About Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    • Our Philosophy
    • Referral Scheme
    • COVID-19: Current Information
  • SERVICES
    • Women
      • Bioidentical Hormone Replacement for Women
      • Menopause Treatment
      • Breast Thermography
      • Breast Nutricheck
      • Natural Facelift Program
      • Fertility Improvement
      • PULS Heart Health
      • BioJeune Face Rejuvenation
      • BioGroHair Restoration For Women
      • Bio’O’ Libido Enhancement
    • Men
      • Bioidentical Hormone Replacement For Men
      • Recharge Program For Men
      • BioGroHair® Restoration Consultations
      • Bio’O’ Libido Enhancement
      • PULS Heart Health
    • Cancer Patient Support
    • Autism Support
  • BREAST HEALTH CLINIC
    • Breast Thermography
    • Breast Health Consultations
    • Breast Nutricheck
  • MEDIA/ARTICLES
    • Scientific Articles
    • Blog
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Press
    • Testimonials
      • Breast Health
      • Cancer Patient Support
      • Hormones
      • Hair Restoration
      • General
    • Research
  • FEES
  • CONTACT
    • Find Us
    • Make an Enquiry
Can Your Bra Cause Breast Cancer

Can your bra cause breast cancer? By Dr. EcclesBlog


Avatar for The Natural Doctor
10 May 2018 by Dr. Nyjon Eccles in Breast Health

The role your choice of underwear may or may not play in breast health has been causing a good deal of argument across some online forums recently, with opinion on both sides divided.

On the one hand, people like applied medical anthropologist Sydney Ross Singer point to studies which suggest that tight-fitting bras may be a contributor to breast cancer diagnoses. On the other, those who oppose the view point to an absence of hard science, backed by peer review, to support the claim.

The American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) website carries a strident and desultory challenge to the research cited by people like Singer, accusing him of basing his call for women to pledge to be bra-free to help maintain healthy breasts on a design study that is ‘not acceptable’.

It adds that the study cohort that Singer is attempting to recruit is a ‘sham’ and that the book he has written on the subject and based on his research to date is simply a cynical way of parting people and their money.

Sydney Ross Singer himself – and others who support his conclusions over the possible risk that tight-fitting bras may pose – suggest the reluctance of the ACSH and American Cancer Society to entertain a debate on the subject is in all likelihood motivated by the vested interest those organisations have in preserving mammography as the primary method of breast cancer screening.

Yet, and as some who have witnessed the increasingly hostile exchange between the two sides of the argument have observed, there is no cost to anyone of electing to go bra-free or for choosing a non-underwire bra option and there is no cost to joining Singer’s study group.

Others argue that any research into potential causes of breast cancer should be considered helpful and that if someone wants to buy a book for £10 or $10, even if it doesn’t have hard and fast answers, then that’s their prerogative.

I’d take the argument further still.

First of all, there can be no harm in being cautious and selecting a non-constricting non-underwire bra or even living bra-free. Society, rather than nature, has deemed the bra a necessary or desirable piece of underwear and over the centuries it has evolved beyond its original so-called practical use into an item of clothing that is has become increasingly sexualised.

That said, it is a similar argument to whether or not to use aluminium-containing deodorants. The work of Dr Philippa Dabre shows increased aluminium within breast cancer tissue compared to non-cancerous tissue. Whether or not this is a causal relationship, it represents at least an association that should lead to women choosing underarm deodorants wisely.

It’s the same with choosing a bra. If there might be an association with type of bra and increased risk, then why not choose a safer option?

Second, medicine does not have all the answers. It cannot say with any certainty what does and does not cause breast cancer and therefore it seems short-sighted, if not a little petulant and churlish, to rule out the bra as a potential contributor to risk.

Third, we know that some countries, like Switzerland, have abolished the use of mammogram as a screening tool because its lack of effectiveness as such, while others, such as France, are conducting scientific reviews of its benefits.

Fourth, potential concerns over its own contribution to the cancer risk mean confidence in mammography – which at best, after all, will only confirm that you have the disease already – is far from overwhelming.

There are unanswered questions about the link between the irradiation of regular users of mammography along with (and this is pertinent to the bra argument) some evidence that regular ‘crushing’ of the breast between the screening plates over a period of years may be a cancer trigger – something the clinical medical and academic research communities have so far failed to disprove.

So, if we accept that aggressive manipulation of breast tissue may well be a contributing factor to breast cancer, is it a tremendous leap to consider that a tight fitting constricting underwire bra worn every day, which itself manipulates the breast unnaturally – could also be a factor worth investigating?

Whilst the ACSH and ACS may be vociferous in their rejection of Singer’s claims, it’s worth just pointing out that the best they can offer by way of rebuttal is that ‘there is no proof that bras cause cancer’.

To be clear, it’s important to identify what they’re not saying. They are not saying that research has disproved a link. They are saying there is no research to prove it. And that’s because the clinical research that might settle the argument one way or the other – and the absence of which they identify as the flaw in the Singer argument – has never been carried out.

So which argument has the greater credibility? The argument that has no study of any sort behind it? Or the argument that is backed by at least some degree of study, albeit a study not recognised by the traditional medical community?

That, of course, is for you to decide. But in the meantime, if there’s even a 1% chance it might help you to avoid breast cancer, and you feel comfortable doing so,choosing to wear a non-constricting, non-underwire support bra or going bra free would seem to have very little going against it.

BOOK AN APPOINTMENTFEES
0
Recommend
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIN
  • Pinterest
Share
Tagged in

Contact Us

    Recent Post

    Testimonial from Jennie
    Testimonial from Jennie
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    Testimonial from Angela
    Testimonial from Angela
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    Dr Nyjon Eccles – A natural approach to breast cancer prevention and different techniques for diagnosis
    Dr Nyjon Eccles – A natural approach to breast cancer prevention and different techniques for diagnosis
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    Are You Getting Enough Iodine
    Are You Getting Enough Iodine
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    The case for ivermectin in the fight against Covid-19
    The case for ivermectin in the fight against Covid-19
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles

    Follow us

    NAVIGATE

    • About
    • Services
    • Testimonials
    • Recent Articles
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy
    • T&C
    Google Rating
    4.8
    The Natural Doctor
    The Natural Doctor
    4.8
    Ros
    Ros
    16:57 08 Feb 20
    I had some treatment for a breast condition in the clinic, people are very polite and nice including the doctors. I had to stop the treatment as It was not working but that's fair enough as no everything works for everybody. I stop going to the clinic and nobody in the clinic contacted me to find out what was going on, what happened with me. That showsed lack of care and I was disappointed about that.
    Alison Kittle
    Alison Kittle
    14:33 14 Aug 19
    Been visiting this clinic for nearly 10 years. It reassures me about my breast health and if I raise any concerns they are always answered well. Staff are professional but friendly. Dr Eccles knows his field. Will keep returning for my check ups. Peace of mind is worth so much.
    maria
    maria
    13:27 16 Jul 19
    For several years I have been seeing Dc Eccles for general l wellbeing. After I started seeing him, I felt much better. Excellent Doctor with very good supplements and product. I highly recommend Dr Eccles and his prescription.
    Anwen Pragnell
    Anwen Pragnell
    14:50 20 Jun 19
    A recent breast health scare in my 30's lead me to seek a less invasive option to check breast health. The Thermocheck scan, detailed report and Skype consultation with Dr Eccles was very professional and reassuring. I now feel more informed and supported in preparation for my hospital appointment. I highly recommend Dr Eccles and his team to provide an efficient, professional service and support your health naturally.
    Arthur Moore
    Arthur Moore
    09:27 16 Jan 18
    Thank you for giving me the opportunity to use your excellent product. Although it has only been 2 weeks, both myself and my wife have noticed, the hair growth has certainly become thicker, more of a covering. This is very encouraging, following many years of not really being bothered about my hair loss, now that I am noticing an improvement I am very excited at the prospects of once again having a full head of hair.
    Victoria Harris
    Victoria Harris
    09:54 12 Aug 20
    A very friendly but professional service. Experts in their field that go over and above to ensure you have the best service and experience.Highly recommend.
    See All Reviews
    powered by Google

    FOLLOW

    SIGN UP

    © 2022 All Rights Reserved. The Natural Doctor is a Limited Company. Company Reg. No: 07360121. VAT No: GB282855959 | website by FOME

    The Natural Doctor
    Go to mobile version
    BOOK ONLINE