020 7224 4622info@thenaturaldoctor.org
The Natural Doctor
The Natural Doctor
logo
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • About Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    • Our Philosophy
    • Referral Scheme
    • COVID-19: Current Information
  • SERVICES
    • Women
      • Bioidentical Hormone Replacement for Women
      • Menopause Treatment
      • Breast Thermography
      • Breast Nutricheck
      • Natural Facelift Program
      • Fertility Improvement
      • PULS Heart Health
      • BioJeune Face Rejuvenation
      • BioGroHair Restoration For Women
      • Bio’O’ Libido Enhancement
    • Men
      • Bioidentical Hormone Replacement For Men
      • Recharge Program For Men
      • BioGroHair® Restoration Consultations
      • Bio’O’ Libido Enhancement
      • PULS Heart Health
    • Cancer Patient Support
    • Autism Support
  • BREAST HEALTH CLINIC
    • Breast Thermography
    • Breast Health Consultations
    • Breast Nutricheck
  • MEDIA/ARTICLES
    • Scientific Articles
    • Blog
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Press
    • Testimonials
      • Breast Health
      • Cancer Patient Support
      • Hormones
      • Hair Restoration
      • General
    • Research
  • FEES
  • CONTACT
    • Find Us
    • Make an Enquiry
Catch Up Mammography And The Harley Street Doctor Who Was Ahead Of The Game

Catch-Up Mammography & the Harley Street doctor who was ahead of the game, By Dr. EcclesBlog


Avatar for The Natural Doctor
19 Jun 2018 by Dr. Nyjon Eccles in Breast Health

The fury that has been triggered by the ongoing breast cancer screening scandal may have been unrelenting in its ferocity, but it also serves to obscure the uncomfortable truth – that all evidence shows that mammography does not save lives.

News that a computer error led to nearly half a million women missing out on a final mammogram check over a nine-year period has prompted all manner of outrage and, with it, some questionable estimates around the number of women whose lives were shortened as a result.

The Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, told the Commons the number of women mortally affected by the failure was somewhere between 135 and 270.

But the apparent public shock at that figure, and the notion that such a catastrophic error could be allowed to happen, is based on the false premise that mammography saves lives and is oblivious to other, more profound facts and figures.

Let’s look at the evidence in a context which, with the exception of a handful of respected doctors who wrote to the national media over the weekend to highlight the flawed thinking and advice around mammography screening, the wider medical community seems reluctant to give.

The broad landscape to the issue of mammography screening is one of dubious claims over its effectiveness and the absence of any awareness of risk-benefit balance.

Current Government advice claims screening reduces the risk of dying from breast cancer by around 35%. Yet when we interrogate that number with a little more due diligence, what we learn is that in order to prevent 3 or 4 deaths, an estimated 10,000 women would have to be screened.

The immediate and understandable response to that would likely be that a single life is worth saving. But if we look at the negative impact of screening those 10,000 women, we discover that between 120 and 140 of them would be overdiagnosed and given unnecessary treatment.

Overdiagnosis is the discovery of non-harmful cancers, and the problem here is that at an early stage it’s impossible to tell the benign from the malignant, leading to the possibility that women with tumours that pose no significant threat to life or health are put at risk of harm through unnecessary treatment.

In fact, according to New England Journal of Medicine research reported by Practice Update, there’s a greater chance of a mammogram leading to an overdiagnosis than to the early detection of a tumour requiring intervention.

There are further issues that highlight the shortcomings of mammography as a prevention tool. There is now evidence that suggests continued regular exposure through irradiation screening actually increases cancer risk. Other studies show that regular aggressive ‘crushing’ of breast tissue between the screening plates can itself trigger abnormal breast health, which may lead to cancer developing.

There are other facts and figures.

A representative survey of 5,000 medical professionals in nine European countries discovered that 92% overestimated the extent to which mammography screening could prevent death.

For many years now, it has been my belief that one of the biggest obstacles to prevention of breast cancer is the medical world’s reliance on, and apparently unquestioning belief in, mammography as the only way to deal with it.

So, if those involved in either delivering the screening or treating those cases that result from it don’t understand mammography’s limitations, then it’s simply not conceivable that women are being given the balanced information they need to make an informed choice.

For years it seemed mine was a voice in the wilderness, yet the scandal of the past fortnight has driven those in the medical establishment to speak publicly about their concerns over the effectiveness of screening.

Writing to The Times, 15 respected doctors, including Susan Bewley, professor of women’s health at King’s College London, and Michael Baum, one of the architects of breast screening in the run-up to its public launch in 1988, urged women aged 70 to 79 who were offered catch-up checks to “look this gift horse in the mouth” and turn down the appointment, whilst also advising them to seek help if they find a lump or other symptoms.

They have since been joined by Kailash Chand, honorary vice president of the British Medical Authority who, writing in The Guardian, said he feared ‘most doctors and patients do not understand the medical evidence’ surrounding mammography.

All of them have my support, although I wouldn’t restrict the shortcomings of catch-up mammography screenings to those aged 70 to 79.

As I keep saying, at its absolute best, a mammogram is on average accurate only 60% of the time. And even if it were 100% accurate, the very best it can possibly hope to offer any woman is confirmation that she already has the disease.

So, if mammography carries a potential risk of human cost, if it is not accurate enough, if it has the potential to trigger or accelerate the disease it is supposed to guard against, then what is the point of it?

It’s a question the Swiss medical authorities asked in 2014 before taking the formal position that it would no longer recommend screening mammography. The problem here, of course, is that the total and sole reliance on it means the NHS has nothing to replace it with.

There are other screening options, though, which include the ThermoCheck computer-assisted breast thermography we offer here at The Natural Doctor® and which carries no risk, is suitable for women of all ages and highlights abnormalities in breast tissue temperature to detect possible cancer risk with up to 95% accuracy.

A study by the Nordic Cochrane Collaboration discovered that mammography overdiagnosis increases the number of cancers diagnoses and, condequently, unnecessary biopsies, by 50%, leading the Collaboration’s co-founder, Peter Gotzche to observe: “It’s ironic that the best way to avoid becoming a breast cancer patient is to say no to screening.”

The evidence may question the value of a mammogram, but it also suggests the time has come for a proper dialogue over harnessing expertise and technology inside and outside the NHS to tackle breast cancer prevention and diagnosis

For more information about mammography and the other options available for monitoring breast health and cancer risk, you can watch my video and subscribe to our YouTube channel to stay up to date with the latest news in natural medicine.

BOOK AN APPOINTMENTFEES
0
Recommend
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIN
  • Pinterest
Share
Tagged in

Contact Us

    Recent Post

    Testimonial from Jennie
    Testimonial from Jennie
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    Testimonial from Angela
    Testimonial from Angela
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    Dr Nyjon Eccles – A natural approach to breast cancer prevention and different techniques for diagnosis
    Dr Nyjon Eccles – A natural approach to breast cancer prevention and different techniques for diagnosis
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    Are You Getting Enough Iodine
    Are You Getting Enough Iodine
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles
    The case for ivermectin in the fight against Covid-19
    The case for ivermectin in the fight against Covid-19
    Dr. Nyjon Eccles

    Follow us

    NAVIGATE

    • About
    • Services
    • Testimonials
    • Recent Articles
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy
    • T&C
    Google Rating
    4.8
    The Natural Doctor
    The Natural Doctor
    4.8
    Ros
    Ros
    16:57 08 Feb 20
    I had some treatment for a breast condition in the clinic, people are very polite and nice including the doctors. I had to stop the treatment as It was not working but that's fair enough as no everything works for everybody. I stop going to the clinic and nobody in the clinic contacted me to find out what was going on, what happened with me. That showsed lack of care and I was disappointed about that.
    Alison Kittle
    Alison Kittle
    14:33 14 Aug 19
    Been visiting this clinic for nearly 10 years. It reassures me about my breast health and if I raise any concerns they are always answered well. Staff are professional but friendly. Dr Eccles knows his field. Will keep returning for my check ups. Peace of mind is worth so much.
    maria
    maria
    13:27 16 Jul 19
    For several years I have been seeing Dc Eccles for general l wellbeing. After I started seeing him, I felt much better. Excellent Doctor with very good supplements and product. I highly recommend Dr Eccles and his prescription.
    Anwen Pragnell
    Anwen Pragnell
    14:50 20 Jun 19
    A recent breast health scare in my 30's lead me to seek a less invasive option to check breast health. The Thermocheck scan, detailed report and Skype consultation with Dr Eccles was very professional and reassuring. I now feel more informed and supported in preparation for my hospital appointment. I highly recommend Dr Eccles and his team to provide an efficient, professional service and support your health naturally.
    Arthur Moore
    Arthur Moore
    09:27 16 Jan 18
    Thank you for giving me the opportunity to use your excellent product. Although it has only been 2 weeks, both myself and my wife have noticed, the hair growth has certainly become thicker, more of a covering. This is very encouraging, following many years of not really being bothered about my hair loss, now that I am noticing an improvement I am very excited at the prospects of once again having a full head of hair.
    Victoria Harris
    Victoria Harris
    09:54 12 Aug 20
    A very friendly but professional service. Experts in their field that go over and above to ensure you have the best service and experience.Highly recommend.
    See All Reviews
    powered by Google

    FOLLOW

    SIGN UP

    © 2022 All Rights Reserved. The Natural Doctor is a Limited Company. Company Reg. No: 07360121. VAT No: GB282855959 | website by FOME

    The Natural Doctor
    Go to mobile version
    BOOK ONLINE